How does the title relate to the story?
In the book we can see that the author wants to show us that teens are crazy about sex, thinking that this is the only way to be successful in a marriage. Later on in the text we can see how the author argues that there are other ways to be successful, instead of the first one. That makes you analyze if teens are right or wrong in what they think about this topic. This is related to the title, because it shows how teens are living their lives, what is shown with the word "ecstasies". What means that, they just want to live their lives as if today were their last opportunity to experience different things.
What is the text, story about?
The book is about sex before the marriage and sex after the marriage. It shows how people make mistakes thinking that the person they are with, are what they really want, when he/she is not.
How to realize that the person you are with is the "correct one"?, this kind of question is answered in the book.
How, in your opinion, did the writer make his/her point ?
I think that the author exposes his idea in a very explicit way. He shows what, normaly, a teenager feels in the moment he/she is thinking in other person who is attractive to him/her. Then, the author shows, without reservation, that he is against of having sex before the marriage but, the good thing is that he has his strong arguments. His idea (the author’s idea) is shown in a way that everyone can understand it.
What is the main lesson of the story?
The main lesson is that it is not bad neither wrong to have sex before the marriage, but, if you had sex unprotected, you have to face the consecuences. They could go from an STD to an unwanted pregnancy.
I read this book when I was at school, It's a really good one, talks about young's problems like HIV, sex and other things. Maybe it is a good book to teach sexuality in school but our Minister think that show the reality for teenager is too much,, but I ask to myself Does he know that there are a lot of teenagers that they have child? maybe not. Well, he is only a stupid person of this fu$%&@ government
ReplyDelete